Video: "The NEW Hermes Agent Just Destroyed Claude CoWork & OpenClaw (Full Setup + Real Use Cases)" by Julian Goldie on YouTube.
What the comparison was testing
Julian ran all three tools through the same set of tasks: a content brief turned into a full draft, a research job with multiple sources to synthesise, and a multi-step workflow involving scheduling and follow-up. The point wasn't a benchmark score — it was whether each tool can reliably complete a real job a small business would actually give it.
That's a fairer test than most comparisons. A lot of AI agent demos work beautifully until the moment you deviate slightly from the exact scenario shown. These tests pushed at the edges.
Where Hermes pulled ahead
On longer, multi-step jobs, Hermes came out clearly in front. The combination of persistent memory, the /goal lock, and the Goldie Omnipresence Stack — Hermes coordinating with Claude and other tools through a shared dashboard — meant it kept working through complexity rather than stalling and waiting for input.
It also handled the scheduling task better than either alternative. Hermes supports cron-style scheduling out of the box, so recurring jobs — daily news briefings, weekly reports, ongoing monitoring — don't need you to trigger them each time. That matters a lot for the kind of repeatable business tasks where an agent actually saves time.
What Claude CoWork still does better
Claude CoWork's strength is polished, structured output for a single task. The writing quality from Claude is consistently higher on first draft — more coherent structure, better command of tone, fewer non-sequiturs. And the Live Artifacts feature — no-code dashboards connected to Gmail, Calendar, ClickUp, Airtable — is genuinely useful for teams that want a connected workspace without writing anything.
If the job is "write me something good from a brief and let me interact with the result", Claude CoWork is still the smoother experience. The issue is it doesn't persist, schedule, or coordinate with other agents in the way Hermes does.
OpenClaw's real position
OpenClaw handles browser automation and "out-and-about" tasks — running searches, extracting data from pages, filling forms — better than either alternative. It's also accessible from a phone via Telegram, which makes it useful for quick ad-hoc jobs away from a desk. That's a specific niche, and it's a real one.
Where OpenClaw struggles is on longer autonomous jobs that require maintaining context and adapting when something unexpected happens. It's a capable executor, not a planner. Running it alongside Hermes rather than instead of it is probably the right call for most business use cases.
Where this connects to NordSys
We configure Hermes Agent setups that work alongside Claude and OpenClaw rather than treating them as competing choices. The right stack depends on what you're actually automating — there's no one-size answer. If you want a practical conversation about which combination fits your workflow, we'll give you a straight answer rather than a sales pitch.
See our AI Agents service →